We have full day here and personally I am not a cheerleader of it ..... Kids have to be in school full time for 12 years not including post secondary education but they only get to be a kid for 3.75 -4.5 years why tack two more years on it? ..... Depending on when birthday falls the child could be off to school at 3.75 yrs old ( like my child) I don't think full day jk is necessary. Just my nickel !

































Reply With Quote
However in our area they are getting additional funding to support this it is not being expected to come out of their existing budget ... I know in our area what the 'issue' has been is over the before and after school care cause THAT did not get funded cause they cannot agree as to who is going to offer this ... so the before 9 am and the after 3:30 pm care that was suppose to make the 'full day early learning seamless' cause some school boards wanted to offload it to third parties who are already doing it and others were saying NO it had to be offered in house and so forth ... so I know in our area a lot of schools are not getting THAT component of the program ... and I am torn cause yes there are programs already doing this but the school boards have the SPACE sitting there and it makes sense to me that it be used to provide that seamless care - it SHOULD be cheaper than having to cover the cost of two locations and so forth however typical of school board and government their 'predictions' for the cost of this is MORE than what parents are paying for full day care in centres ... go figure



