Hmmm ... hard call for me it would depend on what the 'challenges' were I was facing making me decide if this was not for me?

Are the issues with the 'business administration end', with the dealing with the client end or with the children and program end ... how much control did I have over changing the challenges and were they things that were 'skill based' that I could acquire the skill with more practice or things that were 'innate' you either are able to do it or not!

IME there are some things that no amount of time are going to 'fix or make better' they are things you just naturally able to do .... I have worked with peers in the 'centre field' who while really 'book smart' they really should NOT have be in this field because their inability to manage a GROUP was not there t hey were not able to multitask putting children at RISK ... the % of accidents occurring DAILY on their watch because they were not 'supervising' properly was just TOO HIGH but often dismissed by both the peer and management as well 'kids get hurt all the time it is part of childhood' ... IMO the children were allowed to get themselves into situations that COULD have been avoided with support of a properly skilled adult who could multi task dealing with one while still 'watching' all the others to redirect and prevent injuries caused by poor choices of the child (running inside, climbing unsafe areas, etc all avoidable injuries) and than there were the peers who literally 'lost' children who were able to have time to have wondered away from the group because they were not able to continually 'scan' the room while dealing with one child within the group and so forth. .... peers who after years in the field were still doing this same thing cause it was not something they could 'learn' to do.