-
Euphoric !
 Originally Posted by angelina
....How much lower are they taking about? Was it strictly recommending how many part time or full time?
They are basically talking about requiring the rules to be the SAME regardless if you are with an agency or a private providers .... so basically your OWN to be counted in your five and that even private would have to follow the rules about the age mix allowed ... the reality is this has been being discussed since back in 2008 when I was still with my agency so well before this poor boy drowned .... the 'inequity' between private and regulated care has been part of the round table discussions on how to promote more providers to choose to be with a licensed agency and the barriers that are seen ... as the rules currently in place actually promote 'unregulated' as a more financially appealing option because you do not have to count your own children and can choose whatever age groups you feel able to serve .... which is why there are more unregulated providers and with the introduction of 'full day early learning' here in Ontario even more regulated providers have had to jump ship to 'private' in order to make a viable income because the pool of children over the age of 3 to fill the remaining spaces has shrunk considerably!
Children construct their own intelligence. The adult must provide activities and context, but most of all must be able to listen. Children need proof that adults believe in them. Their three great desires are to be listened to, to understand, and to demonstrate that they are exactly what we expect."
Loris Malaguzzi
-
-
Starting to feel at home...
Do any of you have a degree in early childhood? Just wondering if it is the norm to have a degree or not in your area.
As a parent, I would prefer my child care provider to have a secondary degree in early childhood. It isn't just about the love, supervision and play time. I think really knowing and understanding child development is just as important. Just because someone is a mom or has kids, doesn't mean they are equipped to care for kids.
Experience is defintely a huge role in being a provider but education is also important.
As a parent who has had to search for a good provider for my child, I believe it is my business whether or not the provider I choose has a secondary degree or not.
-
-
Starting to feel at home...
 Originally Posted by Serendipity
Do any of you have a degree in early childhood? Just wondering if it is the norm to have a degree or not in your area.
As a parent, I would prefer my child care provider to have a secondary degree in early childhood. It isn't just about the love, supervision and play time. I think really knowing and understanding child development is just as important. Just because someone is a mom or has kids, doesn't mean they are equipped to care for kids.
Experience is defintely a huge role in being a provider but education is also important.
As a parent who has had to search for a good provider for my child, I believe it is my business whether or not the provider I choose has a secondary degree or not.
I do not have degree in early childhood education, but I have a Bachelors Degree in Education and undergraduate in Aerospace Engineering (Carleton U).
I undergone many training along the way in the last 12 years, as private nanny, as babysitter, as daycare worker, as a mom.
Even with my degree, I do not think I would be able to translate all the theory into practice if I was not truly interested in children in general. I know some daycare center staff, that are "just there"....and I do not sense they would love to continue working with children.
A provider could show you curriculum, and programming by the book [Montessori trained] and followed stimulating activities base on their developmental skills, but if she lack the special element which is love for children, everything else will go downhill. You will sense that when your child come to this provider, your own child can feel if this a home environment she wanted to be.
I'd say, some providers are born for this job and nurtured and develop that sense of holistic approach to running a business and providing early education to children through play.
Some gain the perspective through formal education, some through lifetime experience.
Whether by formal education or lifetime experience, to my eyes, they can take over my job.
Anyone who has lifetime experience in the daycare business always attend trainings and update themselves with latest tools and theory to apply at your home business. I think even agencies send their daycare providers to trainings. Most caregivers even without theoretical training have initiative to bring their kids to libraries, OEYC playgroups with RECE who supervised structured time.
Around my area, I don't know any caregiver who have RECE. Few I know have Personal Support Worker Diploma, RPN, Developmental Service Worker, mom and grandmother.
Definitely, the home daycare is not for everyone. With the upcoming changes with the DNA (if implemented), I wonder how many more hoops we will endure to be deemed qualified to be the EARLIEST childhood educators.
BTW, does anyone read the ELECT document yet? What do you think of this framework? Throw the lesson plan away and start over?
If they whine, give them cheese. If they're not hugable, hug yourself. (me)
-
-
Starting to feel at home...
no 3 under 3 - so yes, loss of income, since the 4 years old are gone full day
 Originally Posted by Inspired by Reggio
They are basically talking about requiring the rules to be the SAME regardless if you are with an agency or a private providers .... so basically your OWN to be counted in your five and that even private would have to follow the rules about the age mix allowed ... the reality is this has been being discussed since back in 2008 when I was still with my agency so well before this poor boy drowned .... the 'inequity' between private and regulated care has been part of the round table discussions on how to promote more providers to choose to be with a licensed agency and the barriers that are seen ... as the rules currently in place actually promote 'unregulated' as a more financially appealing option because you do not have to count your own children and can choose whatever age groups you feel able to serve .... which is why there are more unregulated providers and with the introduction of 'full day early learning' here in Ontario even more regulated providers have had to jump ship to 'private' in order to make a viable income because the pool of children over the age of 3 to fill the remaining spaces has shrunk considerably!
I agree, we are losing the 4 year old in the area due to full day kindergarten, so its a tough call between staying in business or find livelihood somewhere else.
Even my own toddlers do no count, (private daycares), I still count them on the 5, because the liability insurance only covers 5 children in my house under the age of 10. For insurance purposes, your own child count.
That is why i see many daycare with agency in my area switch to private - to allow more mix to the group - as our 4 year old are gone. (most catholic and public have full day for our 4 year old)
How is it in your area Reggio? Are all schools at full day for year old or it is still half day?
angie
If they whine, give them cheese. If they're not hugable, hug yourself. (me)
-
Similar Threads
-
By AmandaKDT in forum Opening a daycare
Replies: 2
Last Post: 03-10-2013, 03:13 PM
-
By jazmic in forum Managing a daycare
Replies: 8
Last Post: 02-02-2013, 07:53 PM
-
By Starshine in forum Caring for children
Replies: 6
Last Post: 12-08-2012, 12:07 PM
-
By mlc1982 in forum Caring for children
Replies: 13
Last Post: 12-06-2012, 12:52 PM
-
By pumpkin in forum Daycare activities
Replies: 3
Last Post: 08-18-2011, 12:48 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Forum Rules
|